Competitive comparison

TheAX vs Studio:Blueprint.
Which moment are you at?

Both platforms describe themselves as consulting operating systems. The difference is not the technology — it is where in your journey each one starts.

TheAX
For firms ready to productise
Structured onboarding programme. £18,465 before platform access. Built for teams with documented, codified IP and budget to invest.
vs
Studio:Blueprint
For firms ready to start
Self-serve. Live in one session. £799/year, everything included. Built for firms at any stage — including methodology still in progress.
TheAX Studio:Blueprint
Starting price £850 onboarding + £64/user/month £799/year all-in
Full onboarding cost Up to £18,465 before platform fees £0
Self-serve Requires a sales conversation Live in one session
Minimum users 10 users on Grow plan 1 user
Client portal cost £10–£150 per client/month extra Included
Evidence Desk Not available Available from day one
Methodology input Upload existing structured IP Upload, chat, voice, or build from scratch
Agent layer Not available Stanley, Quill, Morgan, Blake, and others
Who it's for Firms with codified methodology ready to productise Firms at any stage, including methodology still in progress
Entry point Operational maturity required Any point — including week one of your first engagement
The pricing difference

One platform costs
£18,465 to get started.
The other costs £799/year.

TheAX full journey
£18,465
Before platform access begins. Then £64/user/month, with client portals charged separately.
  • AX Define — £850 (business line clarity)
  • AX Sprint — £2,950 (build the consulting product)
  • Axcend — £5,975/month × 3 months (commercialisation)
  • Platform from £64/user/month (min 10 users on Grow)
  • Client portals £10–£150/client/month on top
Studio:Blueprint
£799
Per year. Everything included. Live in the same session you sign up.
  • Full methodology engine — no cap
  • Forge diagnostics, Evidence Desk, Roadmap
  • Client Progress Rooms — included, no per-client fee
  • Agent layer — Stanley, Quill, Morgan, Blake
  • No onboarding fee, no implementation project
The methodology question

The most important difference
most guides miss entirely.

TheAX assumes you have it.

Their onboarding process — AX Define, AX Sprint, Axcend — is designed to take a structured body of consulting IP and turn it into a deployable product. If you have a named framework, documented criteria, and a clear delivery model, TheAX is designed to operationalise that. They are solving a specific problem for a specific buyer.

Studio:Blueprint helps you build it.

Built for firms where the methodology is still developing, partially documented, or living primarily in the founder's head. Upload whatever you have — a document, a slide deck, a set of interview questions. Describe how you work in a conversation. The system extracts the structure, builds the diagnostic framework, and applies it everywhere. You do not need a finished methodology to start.

The Evidence Desk — where they genuinely diverge

No competitor starts
where consulting actually starts.

TheAX begins with diagnostic design. You structure your IP, build a maturity model, deploy it to clients, and track improvement over time. It is a structured, diagnostic-first workflow.

Studio:Blueprint begins in week one, when a client hands you a pile of files. Strategy documents. Board papers. Previous reports. Stakeholder maps. They arrive in no order, in every format, over several weeks. Before any diagnostic is designed, a consultant is reading, categorising, and making sense of that material.

The Evidence Desk reads those files against your methodology from day one. Without a completed diagnostic. Without a survey sent. The AI surfaces themes, flags tensions, identifies gaps. By the time a diagnostic is ready to deploy, you already have a substantive picture of the client.

The verdict

TheAX does not have this capability. This is not a feature comparison point. It is a fundamentally different model of how an engagement begins.

Who each platform serves

Different buyers.
Different moments.

TheAX is the right fit if...

You have IP ready to productise

  • Your methodology is documented, codified, and named
  • You want a structured onboarding journey with consultant support
  • You have a team of 10+ with budget for implementation
  • Your goal is turning existing IP into a repeatable, scalable product line
Studio:Blueprint is the right fit if...

You want to be running today

  • You are an independent consultant or firm from 1–15 people
  • Your methodology is in progress, partially documented, or in your head
  • You want to be live in one session without an implementation project
  • You want a system that learns your approach — not one that imposes theirs
  • You are any firm from solo practitioner to Deloitte-scale
The honest summary

The question is not which product is better. It is which moment you are at.

If you have a mature, documented methodology and £18,000+ to invest in productising it, TheAX is a serious option with a structured path to a deployable consulting product.

If you want to be live today — if your methodology is still developing, if you cannot absorb a five-figure onboarding cost, or if you want a system that starts from how consulting actually begins — Studio:Blueprint is the choice.

Frequently asked questions

Common questions answered.

Yes. Upload it. The system will ingest it, structure it, and turn it into a diagnostic framework immediately. Firms with existing IP tend to get the most out of Studio:Blueprint fastest.
Not currently. TheAX is built around structured diagnostics and maturity models. Document ingestion and pre-diagnostic evidence analysis is not part of their current product.
Yes. You can sign up, describe how you work, and be running a diagnostic within a single session. No sales conversation required, though support is available.
Yes. Client portals are priced separately at £10/client/month (Engage), £30/client/month (Advance), or £150/client/month (Transform) on top of platform fees. Studio:Blueprint includes client progress rooms in all subscription tiers.
Yes. The methodology engine, evidence desk, and agent layer are available at every tier. The Practice tier (£2,999/year) is built for multi-seat firms with unlimited active engagements. Enterprise arrangements are available.
Upgrade to the next tier. The limits are on active client engagements and seats, not on the capabilities of the product. Every tier gets the full methodology engine.

Run your firm,
not just your projects.

Studio:Blueprint is live. Start today. £799/year.

Start free → See Riplo comparison